[03:16:25] *** Quits: inariksit (~inari@ksit.fixme.fi) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) [03:17:03] *** Joins: inariksit (~inari@ksit.fixme.fi) [05:33:29] *** Joins: Eidel_ (~eidel@c83-249-247-253.bredband.comhem.se) [05:36:52] *** Quits: Eidel (~eidel@c83-249-247-253.bredband.comhem.se) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [08:20:12] *** Joins: myoriel (~Myoriel@aftr-88-217-180-47.dynamic.mnet-online.de) [08:24:18] Trying out jstar's passive construction. [08:24:53] VPSlash must be provided by Cat. [08:28:45] Or it's a lincat. [08:30:50] not sure what you mean.. VPSlash is standard in the RGL [08:33:08] I don't know whether it's a cat or a lincat. [08:34:22] it's a category [08:34:36] http://www.grammaticalframework.org/lib/doc/synopsis.html#VPSlash [09:21:29] PassVPSlash works. [09:28:41] *** Quits: myoriel (~Myoriel@aftr-88-217-180-47.dynamic.mnet-online.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [09:32:03] mmehdig helped me write: PassV3 v np = insertObj (\\_ => v.s ! VPPart ++ v.p ++ v.c2 ++ v.c3 ++ np.s ! NPAcc) (predAux auxBe) [09:33:30] But PassVPSlash looks like it will provide a nicer solution. [10:23:57] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@78.193.21.40) [11:29:35] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [11:48:16] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [12:09:20] *** Quits: Eidel_ (~eidel@c83-249-247-253.bredband.comhem.se) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [12:43:13] *** Joins: Eidel (~eidel@c83-249-247-253.bredband.comhem.se) [14:02:06] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [14:09:12] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@host-95-199-31-254.mobileonline.telia.com) [14:09:15] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) [15:03:58] *** Quits: spectre (~fran@host-95-199-31-254.mobileonline.telia.com) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [18:06:50] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@88.131.62.38) [18:14:39] *** Joins: brinerustle (~Brian@38.Red-83-47-142.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) [18:15:44] hey brinerustle! [18:16:59] hey inariksit! thanks for the tip, will see if gf is what I am looking for! [18:17:15] :) [18:17:28] if you have questions, just ask here [18:17:38] or search from oyr mailing list [18:18:03] I'm atm travelling and on mobile, but it's a google group called gf-dev [18:20:07] great! [18:21:28] another idea occurred to me, to use moses with a corpus of nothing other than a dictionary, might be even easier to create literal translations? [18:22:01] but I will give this a try first and see if i can tweak it to work for me. [18:28:14] *** Quits: spectre (~fran@88.131.62.38) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [18:40:36] brinerustle: yeah maybe, I haven't used moses myself, so I can't estimate how well would that work [18:41:57] btw when I said that you could just replace LexiconYyy with LexiconZzz, that's a lie; constructors are different, they might take different amount if arguments [18:42:37] so for the chinese-spanish I just manually typed spanish words in chinese constructors [18:43:14] but anyway you could get the right words from the existing resource grammars [18:43:35] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@78.193.21.40) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) [18:44:44] my battery is dying, away for an hour or so --> [19:04:50] *** Joins: myoriel (~Myoriel@aftr-88-217-180-47.dynamic.mnet-online.de) [22:18:45] the link: [22:19:09] to the tutorial page from: [22:19:10] http://www.grammaticalframework.org/doc/tutorial/gf-tutorial.html#chaptwo [22:19:20] is broken. should be: [22:19:56] http://www.grammaticalframework.org/doc/tutorial/gf-tutorial.html [22:20:36] ups, the broken link was: Many examples in this tutorial are ___online___ . [22:24:04] never mind! :D ...it was a link back to the same page, no wonder it's broken! [23:23:01] *** Joins: raveesh (~raveesh@14.139.82.6)