[09:30:48] *** Quits: doppioslash (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pfoowsierejqjuvp) (*.net *.split)
[09:57:34] *** Joins: doppioslash (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pfoowsierejqjuvp)
[10:11:48] *** Quits: doppioslash (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pfoowsierejqjuvp) (*.net *.split)
[10:33:21] *** Joins: doppioslash (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mxqgfhnrvdytslos)
[18:53:29] <inariksit> daherb_: this is the latest iteration of my program's output
[18:53:29] <inariksit> ### Very : Quality_8 → Quality_8
[18:53:29] <inariksit> Very Good
[18:53:30] <inariksit> ()8>BFMPQSTVW_abdeghilmnoprstuvyz
[18:54:50] <inariksit> ah nevermind, now it works perfectly!
[18:54:52] <inariksit> 8
[18:54:52] <inariksit> ### Very : Quality_8 → Quality_8
[18:54:52] <inariksit> Very Good
[18:54:52] <inariksit> FodsSpaB> Pre(ThtMQuliy_8Wn)Vgmbvz
[18:56:16] <inariksit> (I know what is wrong, it just looked very surreal when I had a nub in a wrong place :-D)
[18:57:59] <inariksit> and now it's giving me only 12 trees instead of 20, so yay
[19:19:36] *** Joins: proteusguy (~proteus-g@2405:9800:bc10:1ca:2592:86bd:ce4f:1f57)
[20:30:10] <daherb_> inariksit: but didn't you nly expect 8?
[20:37:12] *** Joins: doppioslash_ (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-npyhfiayevsxkckn)
[20:44:45] *** Quits: doppioslash (sid76291@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mxqgfhnrvdytslos) (*.net *.split)
[20:44:56] *** doppioslash_ is now known as doppioslash
[21:16:53] <inariksit> daherb: 4 + 8, instead of 8 + 8
[23:56:51] <inariksit> that was a bad explanation; so originally it was showing two sets of 8 trees, but in fact there was a common subset of 4 trees
[23:57:28] <inariksit> so now I split that into three sets of 4 unique trees, so 4 + 4 + 4