[09:03:09] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie)
[09:25:13] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
[10:52:26] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie)
[12:37:16] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
[14:20:13] *** Joins: myoriel (~Myoriel@aftr-88-217-180-38.dynamic.mnet-online.de)
[15:46:29] *** Quits: myoriel (~Myoriel@aftr-88-217-180-38.dynamic.mnet-online.de) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
[16:04:30] <jstar> "John is allowed to run"
[16:04:52] <jstar> how would you parse that? (what API consructors would you use?)
[16:05:09] <jstar> specifically, what sholud the category of allow be? V2S?
[16:07:18] <jstar> or wait, maybe I meant just VS
[16:10:12] <jstar> or maybe it should be VV ?
[16:17:28] <jstar> ok I've decided VV seems logical
[16:17:43] <jstar> now I get something liek "John allows to run"
[16:26:01] <drbean> It's a passive. Someone allows John to run.
[16:27:39] <drbean> But the only passive in the RGL is for V2 verbs.
[16:30:29] <drbean> V2V, no?