[08:04:51] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@37.160.71.202) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [09:32:12] The RGL has no_Quant, and there is, mkQuant "no" "no" "none" "none", so I can parse "no man wants to work with Dee." but not "no men want to work with Dee." [09:32:57] What do the additional 3 arguments to mkQuant represent? [09:37:22] With mkDet no_Quant pluralNum, I can parse, "no men," but is "no" in these NPs a Quant or a Det? [09:48:03] if you make it with mkDet, it's a det [09:49:18] you have mkNPs for both Quant -> (N|CN) -> NP and Det -> (N|CN) -> NP, so it doesn't really matter which one it is [09:51:00] the first two no's are sg and pl, and none's are like an independent form [09:51:29] for this_Quant and that_Quant it's the same, "I have this cat" and "I have this" [09:51:36] but "I have no cat" and "I have none" [10:05:59] It appears I have to make no_Quant a plural determiner before I can make use of the plural argument. [10:16:50] And I have to make the determiner an NP and then I can make use of 3rd and 4th arguments. [10:19:21] That is, I can parse, "Dee has none." Yay! [10:20:06] mornin all! [10:40:28] morning spectie! [10:41:01] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@37.160.71.202) [10:41:06] drbean: yep, many of the default constructors use singular and plural needs to be specified, or positive, and negative needs to be specified [10:47:36] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@37.160.71.202) (Quit: Quitte) [10:49:20] :) [12:52:18] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@139.239.24.109.rev.sfr.net) [14:48:32] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@139.239.24.109.rev.sfr.net) (Quit: Quitte) [15:06:13] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@139.239.24.109.rev.sfr.net) [18:09:35] *** Joins: myoriel (~Myoriel@2001:a60:1390:b401:e7:25f7:218a:360b) [22:32:56] *** Quits: myoriel (~Myoriel@2001:a60:1390:b401:e7:25f7:218a:360b) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [23:24:35] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@139.239.24.109.rev.sfr.net) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)