[00:43:29] *** Joins: Eidel (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) [00:47:00] *** Quits: Eidel_ (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [02:52:42] *** Joins: Eidel_ (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) [02:55:55] *** Quits: Eidel (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [03:55:51] *** Joins: Eidel (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) [03:59:47] *** Quits: Eidel_ (~eidel@c83-249-241-114.bredband.comhem.se) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) [08:28:32] yes it's going to be in/on Gozo [08:32:28] :D [08:54:15] does gf have a mailing list i should subscribe to ? [08:56:26] we have a google group [08:56:38] aha [08:56:48] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gf-dev [08:56:49] this one ? [08:57:01] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gf-dev [08:57:01] yeah [08:57:02] :) [09:00:14] joined [09:31:43] I liked Peter's quote the other day [09:31:58] "Any grammar formalism you've heard of is bigger than GF" [09:32:29] :) [09:32:32] we need some perspective every now and then :P [09:32:48] but is there no commuity (eg conference) specifically for grammar formalisms? [09:32:58] hmm, maybe workshops [09:33:08] also, LFG and HPSG might be technically bigger [09:33:14] but GF probably has more practical applications :) [09:34:00] perhaps but I don't know much about how those other big formalisms have been used in applications [09:34:05] I find that's not easy to tel [09:34:20] http://emmtee.net/ [09:34:33] "Last updated: 2007-11-30 (11:11)" [09:38:47] :) [09:42:19] these people seem to be active http://www.fcg-net.org/ [09:42:54] oo videos! that's more than we have... [09:43:04] we went to their thing [09:44:04] they have some nice ideas [09:47:03] looks pretty new, all their pubs are from 2012 [09:47:25] yeah [09:47:43] mm this would make a great topic for the grammar formalisms course [09:47:51] i liked that they could parse learner mistakes [09:47:55] e.g. overregularisation [09:48:14] "i seed it with my own eyes" [09:48:20] or "i sawed it with my own eyes" [09:48:30] that's neat [09:48:36] are they based at a particular uni [09:48:36] ? [09:48:48] one in the netherlands and at a sony research lab in paris i think [09:49:11] that stuff should really be done in FST morphology too, using weights [09:49:44] because at the moment you'd just "seed" as "to seed" and "sawed" as in past of "to saw" [09:50:26] ok, going into uni now [09:57:00] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [10:24:11] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [10:34:22] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [10:43:55] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@dhcp263-ans.wifi.uit.no) [10:44:05] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@dhcp263-ans.wifi.uit.no) (Changing host) [10:44:05] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [11:31:41] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Quit: Leaving) [11:31:57] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [11:48:03] *** Joins: chru (~cunger@2001:638:504:2099:18dc:1abf:d7c1:39c5) [12:08:45] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [12:12:33] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [12:20:23] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Quit: Leaving) [12:20:47] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [12:29:19] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Quit: Leaving) [12:29:52] *** Joins: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [13:01:15] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@129.242.93.135) [13:03:22] *** Quits: spectie (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [13:12:08] *** Joins: spectei (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [13:12:16] *** Quits: spectre (~fran@129.242.93.135) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [14:00:27] *** Quits: spectei (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) [14:17:00] chru: Can you comment on PDRT-Sandbox, the implementation of Discourse Representation Theory from the Groningen Meaning Bank? [14:17:37] I know there is an implementation of DRT in your book, Computational Semantics with Functional Programming. [14:20:16] i didn't have a look at the PDRT sandbox yet. but i bet their implementation is more sophisticated than ours. [14:22:13] *** Joins: spectei (~fran@unaffiliated/spectie) [14:24:03] I noticed in some of your repositories that you are parsing pronouns, so I thought you must be using DRT. [14:24:08] some day, i hope, there will be a good occasion to work with the GMB. but i don't work data-driven enough yet ;) [14:24:19] hei! [14:24:29] GMB ? [14:24:33] and DRT ? [14:25:03] the grammars i have contain pronouns, that's true, but actually i just parse them currently, i don't interpret them yet [14:25:05] Groningen Meaning Bank and Discourse Representation Theory. [14:25:18] aha [14:25:27] http://gmb.let.rug.nl/ [14:25:38] aye, i've seen that [14:25:50] i seem to remember something about kazakhstan [14:26:02] yeah: [14:26:03] http://gmb.let.rug.nl/explorer/explore.php?part=62&doc_id=0756&type=raw&filter_part=&filter_status=A&filter_subcorpus=&filter_bows=&filter_warnings= [14:26:03] [14:26:04] :D [14:27:39] GMB has released http://hbrouwer.github.io/pdrt-sandbox/ [14:30:37] cool [14:32:01] did you have a look at the PDRT implementation, drbean? [14:34:16] I am going through the tutorial. [14:35:04] I am going to try to integrate it into my question-answering app. [14:35:47] nice [14:48:54] They're talking about different kinds of composition, depending on whether DRT structures are asserted material, projected material, as in presuppositions, or parenthetical material, which don't bind to any context. [14:51:26] so it's similar to boxer, i guess. (but i'm not sure whether the boxer implementation is available somewhere...) [14:57:47] They say they implemented Projective DRT as part of Boxer, and that it is a simplification of [14:58:51] .. Geurts and Maier's Layered DRT. [14:59:26] ah, interesting [17:39:51] *** Parts: chru (~cunger@2001:638:504:2099:18dc:1abf:d7c1:39c5) ()