[01:33:01] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@117.6.163.56)
[02:59:03] *** Quits: jmvanel (~jmvanel@117.6.163.56) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[05:55:39] *** Joins: vin-ivar (uid74719@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ecgnaftqkyevfzta)
[08:07:46] *** Quits: vin-ivar (uid74719@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ecgnaftqkyevfzta) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
[08:31:40] *** Joins: vin-ivar (~vinit@182.70.2.168)
[11:52:11] *** Joins: jmvanel (~jmvanel@117.6.163.56)
[12:20:57] <vin-ivar> inariksit, ping me when you have a minute
[12:48:49] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@115.114.202.84.customer.cdi.no)
[13:11:24] <inariksit> vin-ivar: now!
[13:11:30] <inariksit> just going to get a cup of tea
[14:46:20] <vin-ivar> whoops, sorry, I was driving
[14:52:09] <inariksit> no problem :) I'm available now
[14:53:00] <vin-ivar> cool
[14:53:01] <vin-ivar> so
[14:53:16] <vin-ivar> I've managed to write stuff that builds danish nouns and adjectives
[14:53:28] <vin-ivar> (assuming worst case, noun and gender for mkN and five forms for mkA)
[14:54:38] <vin-ivar> well, I have the script, anyway. running the nouns bit on the expanded monodix kills my laptop
[14:56:15] <vin-ivar> http://paste2.org/gGkdkfKV <- nouns
[14:56:34] <vin-ivar> http://paste2.org/PZEpaILc <- adjectives
[14:56:38] <vin-ivar> does this look okay?
[14:57:16] <inariksit> yep! ^^
[14:57:27] <inariksit> looks nice
[15:07:35] <vin-ivar> yay
[15:07:40] <vin-ivar> I was looking at aarne's lrec paper
[15:07:50] <vin-ivar> on resource sharing between rbmt systems
[15:09:49] <vin-ivar> i think using closely related languages could be pretty handy for building monodixes/concrete things in either framework
[15:10:40] <vin-ivar> like here, I didn't have a source for english -> danish, and all the functions were english words, so I could convert the swedish thing to danish
[15:11:01] <vin-ivar> there's likely to also be fewer inconsistencies with separable verbs and stuff
[15:11:51] <vin-ivar> what do you reckon?
[15:21:37] <inariksit> yeah, for monodixes definitely makes more sense than via english
[15:39:49] <inariksit> btw, I just had a look at your latest (well, 10 days :-P) code in apertium-gf
[15:40:24] <inariksit> sorry I've been pretty inactive with that! anyway it is a relevant thing and would be cool to continue
[15:40:44] <inariksit> did you plan to have conversion between GF and apertium formats?
[15:40:52] <inariksit> well tagsets
[15:42:30] <inariksit> MorphDisambiguator doesn't print anything for me, btw
[15:43:16] <vin-ivar> shit, I should update the repository with the scripts :s
[15:43:26] <vin-ivar> pipe the MorphAnalyser output to it
[15:44:23] <inariksit> ah ok
[15:44:29] <vin-ivar> I'm thinking of building a sort of system that can take advantage of stuff that's in Apertium (shooting it into GF) or vice versa
[15:45:21] <inariksit> yeah ok
[15:45:44] <inariksit> if it's just lexicon building, many of the tags in apertium don't appear in the dictionary format
[15:46:17] <inariksit> but if we'd like to have a conversion between an actual sentence, then it'd need all these apertium tags
[15:46:50] <inariksit> actually one application for that could be what I'll start working on, inducing CG rules from GF grammars
[15:49:26] <vin-ivar> yeah, that's what i thought as well
[15:49:34] <vin-ivar> some sort of mapping
[15:53:22] <inariksit> yeah
[15:59:46] <vin-ivar> trying to visualise what it ought to look like
[16:03:21] <vin-ivar> i'm also thinking of implementing/sharing some sort of lexical selection
[21:11:22] <vin-ivar> inariksit: i've put the adjectives script on the repository
[21:16:23] <vin-ivar> wondering what to work on next, probably tag translation
[21:18:11] <inariksit> yeah, that would be nice
[21:18:27] <inariksit> do you have any preference what language to start with?
[21:18:40] <inariksit> if not, may I suggest spanish :-D because that would benefit my CG stuff
[21:29:22] <vin-ivar> i'd prefer romance/germanic
[21:29:30] <vin-ivar> so spanish works!
[21:30:05] <vin-ivar> what exactly are you working on, with CG?