[02:09:32] *** Quits: drbean (~drbean@124.219.82.94) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [02:13:26] *** Joins: drbean (~drbean@124.219.83.226) [02:27:12] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@115.114.202.84.customer.cdi.no) [02:31:49] *** Quits: drbean (~drbean@124.219.83.226) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) [02:33:04] *** Joins: drbean (~drbean@124.219.82.170) [05:14:58] *** Quits: spectre (~fran@115.114.202.84.customer.cdi.no) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [05:19:47] *** Joins: spectre (~fran@115.114.202.84.customer.cdi.no) [07:12:54] *** Joins: vinit-ivar (~vinit@182.70.10.239) [07:13:45] *** Quits: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.179.148.92) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) [07:14:44] *** Joins: vinit-away (~vinit@182.70.11.123) [07:17:21] *** Quits: vinit-ivar (~vinit@182.70.10.239) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [07:19:22] *** Joins: vinit-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) [07:19:49] *** Quits: vinit-away (~vinit@182.70.11.123) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [08:02:13] *** vinit-ivar is now known as vin-ivar [09:08:29] inariksit: https://github.com/vinit-ivar/apertium-gf/commit/9060fd859c756a038fb3656d7b799b814c6a2b8e [10:32:41] nice! [10:32:44] trying it out now [10:34:23] cool [10:34:42] it takes a couple of seconds to build the morpho and the parse tree [10:34:43] 9 seconds instead of 7 minutes [10:34:59] that's quite rewarding improvement ^^ [10:35:46] \o/ [10:36:04] cool, now to work on the tags [10:36:07] ^^ [10:36:39] how do I compile Lang.pgf without Construction*? [10:36:56] just go to the module and comment out Construction [10:37:32] ah, okay, i was just going to do that [10:42:34] i'm making TranslateSpa without constructions and chunking [10:47:11] you can also comment out MkSymb and SymbPN [10:51:38] linking ... gf: GrammarToPGF.mkFId: missing category VPI [10:51:40] :s [10:57:39] did you remove ExtensionsSpa as well? [10:58:33] you can also just remove/include some parts, e.g. ChunkSpa [VPI] [10:58:40] so it imports only VPI from ChunkSpa [10:58:58] or ChunkSpa - [Foo,Bar] imports everything but Foo and Bar from ChunkSpa [11:04:56] *** Quits: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [11:09:26] *** Joins: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) [11:17:36] okay, commenting out Extensions did the trick [11:26:10] if you remove that, it's mostly just lang with big lexicon :-P [11:26:20] but yeah, it might be difficult just to remove Chunk [11:26:22] I haven't tried [11:33:55] *** Quits: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [11:40:37] *** Quits: drbean (~drbean@124.219.82.170) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [11:46:39] *** Joins: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) [11:47:13] *** Joins: drbean (~drbean@124.219.83.225) [11:48:30] inariksit, did you try the disambiguator out on Lang or Translaet? [11:48:34] Translate [11:49:06] both [11:50:18] it works okay on Translate? [11:50:29] i tried running it twice, laptop died both times [11:50:33] trying again [11:58:17] oh [11:58:22] it worked [11:58:23] so the 9 seconds was for translate [11:58:24] yay [11:58:29] oh wow [11:58:34] yay! [12:01:06] okay, i'm thinking I should drop tags like and and stuff now [12:01:10] while transferring tags [12:02:46] ^no/no$ <- apertium [12:05:34] *** Quits: crazydiamond (~crazydiam@178.141.71.231) (Remote host closed the connection) [12:06:40] *** Quits: drbean (~drbean@124.219.83.225) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [12:08:42] *** Joins: drbean (~drbean@124.219.82.83) [12:32:34] usted: [12:32:39] s -> sg [12:32:41] ton -> tn [12:33:21] nothing indicating third person in the GF parse [12:35:00] inariksit, should i make the changes ? (i'm not going to change my affiliation) [13:40:36] spectre: would be nice! [13:40:39] you can change mine [13:40:49] I have already the english name in the CG workshop paper [13:41:32] the space usage is tricky, I tried couple different placings of the table in the tex document, but it would just place it on an empty page [13:41:44] if you know how to do it easily, nice [13:42:05] try [H] [13:42:18] vin-ivar: I think the s is just the field name in the GF record [13:42:22] Sg should be singular [13:42:36] also ton is a field name [13:57:27] field? [13:57:32] what is that in this context? [14:02:33] inariksit, done [14:03:09] i used vspace it might be outside the margins [14:03:09] but i think it looks ok [14:03:38] spectre: ok, great! [14:03:47] vin-ivar: the records have named fields [14:04:27] N = {s : Number => Case => Str ; g : Gender} ; [14:04:53] Num = {s : Case => Str ; n : Number ; hasCard : Bool} ; [14:05:15] all of them have a field called s, which is a string, or a table that will eventually get to a string [14:10:18] oh okay, those [14:10:20] hang on [14:15:04] *** Quits: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) (Read error: No route to host) [14:17:46] *** Joins: vin-ivar (~vinit@122.170.48.35) [14:18:56] > [14:18:57] > My apologies, I did not mean to offend you. I wasn't sure it came [14:18:57] > across clearly the first time, hence why I mentioned it again. Your [14:18:57] > affiliaton remains as-is then -- it is not a must. [14:18:58] ^__^ [14:23:19] nice! [14:33:54] what paper is this? [14:34:55] inariksit, lookupMorpho is showing fields as well, then [14:47:47] vin-ivar: yep [14:48:02] the paper we're talking about is the normalisation of colloquial finnish [14:48:34] and they wanted us to change our affiliation names from swedish and north sami to english [14:48:59] + some replacement of tables [18:56:21] vin-ivar: you might be interested http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/euterpea/haskell-school-of-music/ [18:56:37] I haven't read it, aarne just mentioned and I googled it [19:04:53] hahah cool, here's music as CCG grammar http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/steedman/papers/music/slides5.pdf [19:40:11] i'm back [19:40:13] hey [19:40:19] oh that looks interesting [19:58:12] 15. From Performance to MIDI [19:58:15] MIDI :s [20:06:37] too much jazz for me, this is incentive to learn more [20:06:40] :D [20:18:39] "So it is only practicable to play this sort of music in Equal Temperament" [20:19:08] wow, they're taking this very seriously, haha [20:45:16] inariksit: could you send me the disambiguated sentence you'd done with Translate? [22:12:59] spectre: how does apertium deal with constructions like "por eso"? [22:13:03] treat it as one unit, I mean [22:13:12] just paradigms, right?