[03:55:07] *** Joins: drbean_ (~drbean@TC210-63-209-97.static.apol.com.tw) [10:58:49] *** Quits: drbean_ (~drbean@TC210-63-209-97.static.apol.com.tw) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+cygwin2 - https://znc.in) [11:10:37] *** Joins: wmacmil (~wmacmil@c83-252-138-144.bredband.tele2.se) [11:10:41] *** Joins: dobrovskaya (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) [11:10:57] hey elena [11:11:29] type your question here [11:11:47] Hello [11:12:42] wait did i spell your name right [11:12:43] I have questions (or rather, one big question) about the RGL implementation of Basque (Euskara) [11:13:25] yes, Elena [11:14:18] whats your question [11:15:32] since Euskara is a kind of agglutinative lang, I don't understand how to handle that in GF [11:16:49] I would like to glue (+) words together at phrasal level, rather than having tables for all possible combinations [11:17:22] but from my (limited) understanding of GF this is not a good praxis [11:18:13] also, side point, you can always check the logs if you happen to get logged off and want to see if someone answered [11:18:15] http://www.grammaticalframework.org/irc/ [11:18:33] or just check if someone previously asked something you can easily grep [11:19:57] for instance, adding a determiner to a noun is done by adding the suffix -a to the noun. I'd rather have my noun as a string and have the rule for NP glue the suffix. And I think this is what the RGL does, since it prints out "etxe +& a" or something like this [11:20:39] my question then is, why do I get an error by trying this method [11:20:55] ah nice, thanks warrick ! [13:43:25] *** Joins: drbean_ (~drbean@TC210-63-209-84.static.apol.com.tw) [14:03:20] dobrovskaya: the best person to ask would be inariksit but she doesn't seem to be too active here at the moment [14:04:07] aha yes I see, thats no problem, ill be around [14:04:16] if you tried to glue words just using + that does not work. that pretty much only works when defining inflection tables [14:04:55] but the grammar uses the token defined as Prelude.BIND, which is the string (+&) [14:10:38] if you don't know inari's blog yet, there is plenty of good explanation. there is actually some information on basque here: https://inariksit.github.io/gf/2018/09/22/grammar-blowup.html [14:52:11] ahá! that is pretty much my problem, I can't glue on runtime arguments, but it is exactly what I would need [14:53:38] how does the +& work sorry? [14:55:09] ah it's right there in her blog =D thanks so much ! [14:57:13] glad that i could help [15:58:50] *** Quits: drbean_ (~drbean@TC210-63-209-84.static.apol.com.tw) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) [19:22:37] *** Joins: dobrovskaya_ (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) [19:25:17] *** Quits: dobrovskaya (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [21:15:46] *** Quits: freeside (~ubuntu@ec2-52-58-69-57.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [21:17:05] *** Joins: freeside (~ubuntu@ec2-52-58-69-57.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com) [21:51:46] *** Quits: dobrovskaya_ (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [21:53:30] *** Quits: wmacmil (~wmacmil@c83-252-138-144.bredband.tele2.se) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) [23:23:15] *** Joins: dobrovskaya_ (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) [23:30:57] *** Quits: dobrovskaya_ (~dobrovska@137.red-83-36-140.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Quit: Leaving)